Donald Trump\u2019s top former strategist Steve Bannon was\u00a0sentenced\u00a0Friday to four months in federal prison and $6,500 in fines after he was\u00a0convicted of criminal contempt of Congress\u00a0for refusing to comply last year with a subpoena issued by the House January 6 select committee.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The punishment \u2013 suspended pending appeal \u2013 makes Bannon the first person to be incarcerated for contempt of Congress in more than half a century and sets a stringent standard for future contempt cases referred to the justice department by the select committee investigating the Capitol attack.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The sentence handed down by the US district court judge Carl Nichols in Washington was lighter than\u00a0recommended by prosecutors, who sought six months in jail and the maximum $200,000 in fines because Bannon refused to cooperate with court officials\u2019 pre-sentencing inquiries.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u201cOthers must be deterred from committing similar crimes,\u201d Nichols said as he handed down the sentence, adding that a failure to adequately punish the flouting of congressional subpoenas would enshrine a lack of respect to the legislative branch.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Bannon, 68, had asked the court for leniency and requested in court filings for his sentence to either be halted pending the appeal his lawyers filed briefs with the DC circuit court on Thursday or otherwise have the jail term reduced to home-confinement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
But Nichols denied Bannon\u2019s requests, saying he agreed with the justice department about the seriousness of his offense and noting that he had failed to show any remorse and was yet to demonstrate that he had any intention to comply with the subpoena.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The judge noted in issuing the sentence that he weighed how some factors cut in Bannon\u2019s favor: while he did not comply with the subpoena, he did engage with the select committee and emails appeared to show he had been acting on the advice of his then-lawyer, Robert Costello.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Those mitigating factors suggested that Bannon perhaps did not act in the most contemptuous manner that he could have against the subpoena, and so warranted a lighter sentence than the justice department had recommended, Nichols said.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Nichols also ruled he would stay the sentence as long as Bannon filed his anticipated appeal \u201ctimely\u201d. With his second defense lawyer, Evan Corcoran, understood to have largely finalized the brief, according to sources familiar with the matter, Bannon should meet deadlines.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The far-right provocateur now faces a battle to overturn the conviction on appeal, which, the Guardian\u00a0first reported, will contend the precedent that prevented his lawyers from disputing the definition of \u201cwilful default\u201d of a subpoena, and arguing he had acted on the advice of his lawyers, was inapplicable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
After walking out of the courthouse with his lawyers into a melee of reporters and television cameras, Bannon, dressed in a military-style jacket over several navy-colored shirts, vowed that Democrats would face their \u201cjudgment day\u201d with an appeal that would prove \u201cbulletproof\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The former Trump White House official then climbed into a waiting SUV and returned to his nearby Washington townhouse to immediately host a victorious episode of his War Room show. A person close to Bannon described him as feeling triumphant and unrepentant.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Bannon was charged with two counts of contempt Congress after his refusal to comply at all with the select committee\u2019s subpoena demanding documents and testimony last year triggered the House of Representatives to refer him to the justice department for prosecution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The select committee had sought Bannon\u2019s cooperation after it identified him early on in the investigation as a key player in the run-up to the Capitol attack, who appeared to have advance knowledge of Trump\u2019s efforts to stop the certification of Joe Biden\u2019s election win on January 6.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Among other moments of interest, the Guardian has\u00a0previously reported, Bannon received a call from Trump the night before the Capitol attack while he was at a Trump \u201cwar room\u201d at the Willard hotel and was told of then-vice president Mike Pence\u2019s resistance to decertifying Biden\u2019s win.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The close contacts with Trump in the days and hours leading up to the Capitol attack meant Bannon was\u00a0among the first targets\u00a0of the investigation, and his refusal to comply with the subpoena galvanised the panel\u2019s resolve to make an example of him with a contempt referral.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
During the five -day trial in July, Bannon\u2019s legal team ultimately declined to present evidence after Nichols excluded the \u201cadvice of counsel\u201d argument because the case law at the DC Circuit level,\u00a0Licavoli V United States 1961, held that was not a valid defense for defying a subpoena.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The justice department, according to Licavoli, had to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Bannon\u2019s refusal to comply was deliberate and intentional, and the assistant US attorney Amanda Vaughn told the jury in closing arguments they should find the case straightforward.
\u201cThe defense wants to make this hard, difficult and confusing,\u201d Vaughn said in federal court in Washington. \u201cThis is not difficult. This is not hard. There were only two witnesses because it\u2019s as simple as it seems.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
That meant the only arguments left available to Bannon were either that he was somehow confused about the deadlines indicated on the subpoena, or that he did not realize the deadlines were concrete and failing to comply with those dates would mean he was in default.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Donald Trump\u2019s top former strategist Steve Bannon was\u00a0sentenced\u00a0Friday to four months in federal prison and $6,500 in fines after he was\u00a0convicted of criminal contempt of Congress\u00a0for refusing to comply last year with a subpoena issued by the House January 6 select committee. The punishment \u2013 suspended pending appeal \u2013 makes Bannon the first person to […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":26699,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_post_source_name":"","_post_source_url":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[9306,5304,5178,9649,7960,9784,13254,6693,13305,11282,9560,10507,11139,5262,10391,6576,911,920,7293,3577,12234,10197,7351,2471,12005,5205,6580,10419,7956,10342,10776,3186,5572,10349,3805,8306,11167,11307,11699,8305,5611,11581,9262,6348,2802,5251,2354,6571,2982,3954,594],"class_list":["post-26698","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-world-news","tag-appeal","tag-attack","tag-biden","tag-capitol","tag-case","tag-charged","tag-circuit-court","tag-congress","tag-contempt","tag-convicted","tag-conviction","tag-court","tag-courthouse","tag-cut","tag-declined","tag-democrats","tag-election","tag-episode","tag-fines","tag-future","tag-host","tag-investigation","tag-jail","tag-joe-biden","tag-judge","tag-july","tag-jury","tag-justice","tag-justice-department","tag-law","tag-lawyer","tag-mike-pence","tag-military","tag-navy","tag-president","tag-prison","tag-prosecution","tag-sentence","tag-steve-bannon","tag-steven-bannon","tag-suv","tag-trial","tag-united-states","tag-us","tag-vice-president","tag-war","tag-washington","tag-white","tag-white-house","tag-will","tag-who"],"blocksy_meta":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsemgh.com\/api-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26698","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsemgh.com\/api-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsemgh.com\/api-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsemgh.com\/api-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsemgh.com\/api-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=26698"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsemgh.com\/api-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/26698\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsemgh.com\/api-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/26699"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.nsemgh.com\/api-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=26698"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsemgh.com\/api-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=26698"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.nsemgh.com\/api-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=26698"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}